
Quick navigation: BAM Home
Bias details, teaching context, teaching suggestions:
False Consensus Effect | Just World Bias | Social Desirability Bias | Self-Serving Bias | Groupthink Effect | Actor-Observer Bias | Confirmation Bias | Dunning Kruger Effect / Illusory Superiority | Halo Effect | Bias Blind Spot
Bias: Just World Bias
Definition of the bias: The just-world bias is a cognitive bias that leads people to believe that the world is inherently fair, and that individuals get what they deserve. It suggests that bad things happen to people because they must have done something to deserve it, while good things happen to those who are "worthy."
The just-world bias can have significant implications in educational settings by shaping teachers' and students' perceptions of fairness, effort, and outcomes. Here are some examples:
Classroom Discussion Assumptions: A teacher assumes that students who don’t actively participate in class discussions or debates on controversial topics (e.g., climate change, social justice) must lack interest or critical thinking skills, rather than considering the possibility that they may be hesitant to engage due to cultural differences, shyness, or lack of knowledge on the topic. Hence, Teachers might misinterpret silence or passive participation as apathy, not considering that students might be reluctant to speak out in front of peers, especially on polarizing issues. This can lead to unfair judgments about students’ engagement or intelligence.
IMPACT: this bias can lead to overlooking students' individual struggles or backgrounds, such as language barriers or fear of expressing dissenting opinions in a classroom where there is a perceived “correct” stance
Classroom performance / Group Projects: A teacher observes a student consistently performing below expectations on exams and classwork. The teacher assumes that the student is not trying hard enough, thinking, "If the student really cared, they would put in more effort," rather than considering factors like anxiety, lack of effective study strategies, or difficulty with the subject matter. Then, the teacher may disproportionately penalize the student for the group's overall performance, reinforcing the belief that individuals "get what they deserve" based on their visible actions without considering unseen factors.
IMPACT: The teacher attributes the student's academic challenges solely to their behavior, without considering external factors such as learning difficulties, personal challenges, or a lack of resources. This can perpetuate a cycle of blame and lead to unfair evaluations, preventing the teacher from offering the necessary help or accommodations.Homework
Expectations / Feedback on assignments: A teacher may believe that a student who submits poor-quality work "must not be trying hard enough" or "isn’t committed to learning," rather than considering that the student may face difficulties such as time constraints, a lack of resources, or learning disabilities. Thus, the teacher might provide minimal feedback or assume that the student isn’t putting in effort, failing to recognize that there may be factors preventing the student from meeting expectations.
IMPACT: This can contribute to a cycle of demotivation or disengagement for students who feel that their hard work is not recognized or that they are being judged unfairly based on outcomes.
Technology in the Classroom: A teacher assumes that all students are equally adept at using digital tools for assignments and projects, thinking that students who struggle with technology "just need to try harder," rather than considering factors like limited access to devices or poor internet connections at home. Then, the teacher may penalize students who fail to meet technological expectations, ignoring external factors that influence their ability to complete assignments.
IMPACT: this can lead to disparities between students with access to technology and those without, reinforcing systemic inequalities and contributing to unfair evaluations of student capabilities.
Parental Assumptions: A teacher may assume that all parents are equally involved in their children’s education and that any student who struggles must not have sufficient parental support. This can be especially problematic in situations involving controversial topics, such as discussing racial inequality or LGBTQ+ issues. The teacher might assume that parents who don’t attend parent-teacher meetings or support certain curriculum choices are neglectful or uninvolved, rather than considering cultural or socio-economic factors that might limit parental involvement.
IMPACT: This assumption can lead to misinterpretation of student behavior or academic performance, creating biases about the level of parental support or responsibility, and possibly leading to a lack of empathy or understanding toward students from different backgrounds.
In-class activity:
Below is an activity in which you can use the same situation for teaching purposes. Please first read the scenario to your students and then have them discuss the situation and its implications. You can use the information provided to guide your class discussion.
Scenario
You overhear two students, Sarah and Jake, talking about an incident that happened to Sarah earlier that morning. Sarah recounts how, while sitting in the metro with 10-15 other passengers, she was unexpectedly punched in the head by a stranger. She describes feeling both confused and frustrated about why such a violent act would happen to her. She mentions that she wasn’t provoking anyone, wasn’t arguing with anyone, and was simply minding her own business.
Jake, listening to the story, responds by saying, "You must have done something to provoke that reaction. People don’t just hit others for no reason." Sarah, still shocked, insists that she did nothing to deserve such an attack, but Jake remains skeptical. He suggests that Sarah may have unknowingly given off some "bad vibes" or done something that might have triggered the attack, assuming that violence must have been provoked in some way.
Teaching Points:
This scenario demonstrates how the just-world bias can lead to victim-blaming, where an individual assumes someone "deserved" an unfortunate event based on the belief that people get what they deserve.
Just-world bias is the tendency to believe that people get what they deserve. This bias leads individuals to assume that good things happen to good people and bad things happen to those who deserve it. In the case of Sarah, Jake’s assumption that she must have provoked the attack reflects a classic example of victim-blaming based on the just-world bias. He assumes that people who experience misfortune must have somehow brought it upon themselves, rather than considering the possibility of an unpredictable or unfair event.
Impact on Educational Settings: Just like in the scenario, teachers might inadvertently engage in victim-blaming, assuming that students who face challenges, such as poor grades, disruptive behavior, or personal struggles, must have done something to deserve their difficulties. This bias can lead teachers to be less empathetic towards students, misinterpreting their struggles as due to a lack of effort or poor choices, rather than external factors like personal issues, learning difficulties, or systemic barriers. Finally, the just-world bias can contribute to a lack of support for students who are already disadvantaged, as it may lead teachers to overlook the complex reasons behind students' challenges.
How to Overcome This Bias:
Acknowledge External Factors: Teachers should be mindful of external factors (e.g., socio-economic background, family issues, mental health) that may affect students’ behavior and performance, and approach students’ struggles with empathy.
Practice Empathy and Open Communication: Encourage students to share their concerns and experiences. This can help teachers understand the broader context behind student actions and reactions.
Cultivate a Growth Mindset: Shift the focus from deserving outcomes to the potential for growth and change. Help students understand that challenges are often part of the learning process, and not always a reflection of their character or effort.
Teachers Can Use This Example To: Understand how the just-world bias may influence their perceptions of students' actions and behaviors. Reflect on how they assess student struggles and challenges, and how they can offer more support without assuming blame. Encourage a more compassionate approach to dealing with students who might be facing difficult, unseen circumstances. Foster a classroom culture where students are not judged based on assumptions about what they "deserve," but rather supported in overcoming obstacles.
Discussion Questions:
1. How does the just-world bias influence the way we perceive victims of unfair situations, and how might this affect our interactions with students who are struggling?
2. What are the potential consequences of victim-blaming in educational settings, and how can this impact both the student and teacher?
3. What external factors might contribute to a student’s poor academic performance or behavior, and how can we ensure we consider these factors rather than assuming the student is simply "not trying"?
4. How can teachers create a more empathetic classroom environment that acknowledges and addresses external challenges that students face?
5. In what ways can teachers promote a growth mindset in their classrooms to help students overcome setbacks without judgment or blame?