
Quick navigation: BAM Home
Bias details, teaching context, teaching suggestions:
False Consensus Effect | Just World Bias | Social Desirability Bias | Self-Serving Bias | Groupthink Effect | Actor-Observer Bias | Confirmation Bias | Dunning Kruger Effect / Illusory Superiority | Halo Effect | Bias Blind Spot
Bias: Actor-Observer Bias
Definition of the bias: The actor-observer bias is the tendency to explain one’s own behavior through external, situational factors while attributing others' behavior to internal, personal characteristics.
Actor-observer bias in educational settings can lead to misjudgments and reduced empathy, as teachers and students may unfairly attribute others' actions to personal traits while excusing their own behavior as situational, potentially harming relationships and learning outcomes. Here are some such examples:
Classroom Discussion Assumptions
Teacher's perspective: During a discussion about a controversial topic, such as climate change or social justice, a student expresses strong opinions that the teacher finds disrespectful. The teacher assumes the student is confrontational and argumentative (internal attribution) rather than considering that the student may feel strongly about the topic due to personal experiences or cultural influences (external factors).
IMPACT: When a teacher assumes a student is inherently confrontational, it can damage the teacher-student relationship and discourage the student from sharing their perspective in future discussions.
Student's perspective: A student finds the teacher's approach to moderating the discussion biased and assumes the teacher lacks neutrality (internal attribution), rather than considering the external challenge of managing differing opinions in a limited time.
IMPACT: When a student assumes the teacher lacks neutrality, it can create mistrust, reducing the effectiveness of the teacher's moderation and the student’s engagement in the discussion.
Classroom Performance/Group Projects
Teacher's perspective: A group performs poorly on a project. The teacher attributes the failure to the students’ laziness and lack of teamwork (internal attribution) without considering external factors like unclear instructions, insufficient resources, or scheduling conflicts.
IMPACT: Attributing poor group performance solely to internal factors like laziness can prevent teachers from addressing structural issues, which may hinder students’ learning and teamwork development.
Student's perspective: A student who did poorly in the project blames the group members for not doing their part (internal attribution for others) but excuses their own contribution due to being busy with extracurricular commitments or other coursework (external attribution for self).
IMPACT: Blaming group members for failure while excusing their own contribution can strain peer relationships and hinder accountability, reducing the effectiveness of group learning experiences.
Homework Expectations / Feedback on Assignments
Teacher's perspective: A student regularly submits incomplete homework, and the teacher attributes this behavior to laziness and lack of discipline (internal attribution). The teacher doesn’t consider external factors like the student’s difficult home environment or competing responsibilities, such as a part-time job.
IMPACT: Assuming laziness as the cause of incomplete homework may lead to missed opportunities for providing meaningful support or addressing external challenges the student might be facing.
Student's perspective: A student receives a low grade on an essay and blames it on unclear assignment instructions or the teacher's harsh grading standards (external attribution) but attributes a peer’s low grade to their lack of effort or poor writing skills (internal attribution).
IMPACT: Blaming external factors for their own low grade while attributing peers’ low grades to internal failings may prevent the student from reflecting on their own areas for improvement.
Technology in the Classroom
Teacher's perspective: When students are distracted by their phones during class, the teacher attributes this to their lack of focus or self-control (internal attribution). However, when the teacher misses a deadline for uploading materials to an online platform, they excuse it as being caused by technical difficulties or workload (external attribution).
IMPACT:Attributing students’ distraction solely to lack of self-control may result in punitive actions rather than implementing strategies to engage students more effectively with technology.
Student's perspective: A student assumes that a teacher who struggles with using technology in the classroom is "out of touch" or unwilling to learn (internal attribution) instead of considering that the teacher may not have received adequate training or support (external factors).
IMPACT:Assuming a teacher is unwilling to learn technology may lead to reduced respect and cooperation, potentially undermining the teacher’s authority and efforts to adopt new methods.
Parental Assumptions
Teacher's perspective: When parents fail to attend a parent-teacher conference, the teacher assumes they are disinterested in their child’s education (internal attribution). The teacher may not consider external factors like work conflicts or transportation issues.
IMPACT: Assuming disinterest when parents miss conferences may lead to judgmental attitudes, reducing efforts to build partnerships and communicate effectively with families.
Student's perspective: A student sees their parent’s concerns about their grades as a sign of overreaction or nagging (internal attribution) rather than acknowledging external factors, such as their parent’s worry about college admissions or financial challenges.
IMPACT: Viewing parents’ concerns as overreaction can create tension at home, potentially undermining the parental support needed for the student’s academic success.
Barriers to Effective Communication: In controversial discussions, this bias can prevent both teachers and students from fully understanding each other’s perspectives, causing unnecessary conflict.
IMPACT: The bias can escalate misunderstandings in controversial discussions, leading to defensiveness, unresolved conflicts, and a missed opportunity for deeper learning and empathy.
Potential for Bias in Assessment and Support:
Teachers may focus on students’ perceived deficiencies rather than identifying systemic or contextual barriers to their success.
IMPACT:Focusing on students’ perceived deficiencies without addressing systemic barriers can reinforce inequities, limiting students’ opportunities to succeed and receive appropriate support.
In-class activity
Below is an activity in which you can use the same situation for teaching purposes. Please first read the scenario to your students and then have them discuss the situation and its implications. You can use the information provided to guide your class discussion.
Scenario:
Maria is a bright, hardworking student in Ms. Garcia's biology class, known for consistently completing her assignments on time and actively participating in class discussions. However, Maria didn’t perform well on the recent test and, upon seeing her grade, feels frustrated. She tells her friend, "The test was really unfair; there were questions that weren't even covered in class, and I didn’t have enough time to study because of my other assignments."
Later, when Ms. Garcia hands back the graded tests, Maria notices that her friend Jake also scored poorly. She thinks to herself, "Jake probably didn’t study enough. He always spends his time goofing around in class and doesn’t take school seriously."
Teaching Points:
This scenario illustrates the actor-observer bias, where people attribute their own actions to external factors but judge others’ actions as being due to internal traits.
Impact on Educational Settings:
Teachers may unfairly attribute students' challenges to lack of effort or motivation while excusing their own shortcomings as situational.
Students may misjudge their peers' or teachers’ behaviors, leading to misunderstandings and strained relationships.
This bias can contribute to a lack of empathy and unfair evaluations, ultimately affecting classroom dynamics and student engagement.
How to Overcome This Bias:
Encourage Perspective-Taking: Reflect on external factors that might influence others’ behavior.
Pause Before Judging: Take time to consider situational influences rather than immediately blaming internal traits.
Practice Empathy: Try to understand others' experiences and challenges to build mutual understanding.
Use Data or Conversations: Seek clarification from the person involved instead of relying on assumptions.
Teachers Can Use This Example To...
Teach students the importance of avoiding snap judgments.
Encourage open communication between teachers, students, and peers.
Highlight the need to recognize and address biases in daily interactions.
Build a more empathetic and fair classroom environment by modeling balanced reasoning.
Discussion Questions:
1. Why do you think Maria attributed her own poor performance to external factors but blamed Jake’s performance on his personality or behavior?
2. How might Maria’s assumptions about Jake impact their friendship or ability to work together on future assignments?
3. Can you think of a time when you made assumptions about someone else's actions without considering situational factors? What could you have done differently?
4. How could Ms. Garcia use this situation to create a more supportive and understanding environment for both Maria and Jake?
5. In what ways can recognizing and addressing actor-observer bias improve relationships between students and teachers?